Recovering Evangelical

I have to qualify that I'm not an economist. My educational background is in sociology and criminal justice. I wish I knew more about economic theory and I wish I could make more compelling posts and thoughts about the subject.

I work in the criminal justice field. I work both in the court room and in local jails. My job is to present to judges on behalf of defendants to secure a bond for the defendant. I also do risk assessments, mental health assessments, and drug assessments on defendants charged with crimes.

It probably goes without saying but a lot of people who enter the criminal justice system in my area (Eastern Kentucky) are poor.

I do want to make the qualification (though its sad that it has to be made) that not all poor people come into contact with the criminal justice system. Not all poor people possess mental health problems or possess drug/alcohol addictions.

There are plenty of law abiding citicizens that are poor.

Since I do work with a certain population of poor (or indigent) people I have become even more concerned with issues of poverty.

I interview time and time again persons who are indigent. Often times poor people who are employed lose their job after they are arrested. If they cannot make bail they spend time in jail (even though they have yet to be convicted). Since they miss so many days of work due to being in jail they lose their job. It just seems wrong.

Is this "justice"?

Not only is the system set up to where poor people are less likely to make bond (which causes them to potentially lose their job) but they are also often subjected to absurd court costs if they have go on through the system and are eventually convicted.

Often times when persons are unable to pay their fines and court costs the person is re-arrested under a failure -to- pay- fine bench warrant.

Not only do these issues affect the poor but they also contribute to prison and jail over crowding.

I often wonder where is the humanity in the criminal justice system?

Granted I love my job and I feel like an advocate for the defendants I see, but I can't help but to question what I see. I see a system that is tough (and perhaps at times it should be) but I also see a system that keeps a person down when he or she is already down.

I do think there needs to be changes in the criminal justice system and sometimes these changes can be made by the judge.

Judges set bonds for defendants. As much as I try to help defendants bond out of jail I can't do that unless a judge believes in giving non-financial bonds. So the judges judicial philosophy is important. Also the judge's feelings toward the poor is also important.

I often question how popular social conservatives in our media characterize the poor (I am talking about those in television, magazine, and online articles). They often characterize the poor as lazy, uneducated, criminals, drug abusers, etc.

Often the poor is blamed for their own condition. Social conservatives have set a narrative that prevents a lot of people from criticising capitalism publicly. There has been a marriage between the religious right and Wall Street. To question our economic system is to be un-patriotic or un-American.

Our system is designed in a way that we'll always have the poor. The poor and the lower class serve a function structurally (as they do the jobs that most of us won't do or do not want to do). You don't have to be an instrumental marxist to understand that the structure of our economy demands the existance of the lower class.

So we have a narrative that makes it hard to question capitalism, we have a system in place that relies on the poor and the working poor, and we have a criminal justice system (that at least in my mind) helps keep the poor, poor.

We have this belief in the American Dream, but we have to understand that the dream is not obtainable to all persons. There are many hurdles that prevent this dream from being realized.

I wish we could challenge popular stereotypical notions of why the poor exist and what makes them poor. I wish we could take steps to alleviate burdens on the poor. Sure there are a lot of groups that offer assistance to the poor, but there are also ingrained institutional and structural hurdles put in place that maintains the poor (of course there are also individual variables that exist also).

So the problem of poverty is a complex one, and as I qualified above I'm not even close to an expert on this subject.

I do know that on a personal basis I come into contact with a lot of poor people through my work and my heart goes out to a lot of these folks. I often wonder what happens to these folks when they do bond out of jail and they have to struggle to find another job because they lost theirs simply because they could not afford to make bail.

These are just some of my general thoughts about the poor. What's yours?
Fred Holland Comment by Fred Holland on February 18, 2009 at 7:22pm
I am only an expert on being one of the working poor. But I have a ton of opinions. One of the problems of every society is they have a class system of some sort. Working Class(me), The Ruling Class, The Poor(also me), The Have's(still me) and the Have not's. I work very hard in a factory as a fabricator. I do have some education, but it is in Theology, Psycology, Art. No degree, just enough education to pretend I know something but not enough to fool anybody. We(my wife and I) have two children, the oldest is physicaly handicaped with profound mental retardation, she is twenty five years old. We did not ask for this situation and there is no way out. I cannot improve my income as the company I work for only hires managment from outside the company.
From my perspective, our country is set up on the false belief that if you hurt people enough they will become good moral people and when they can't afford to pay the fine, then we hurt them some more.
There was once a time when we did not have car insurance. We had a car. And we drove that car, but we could not afford insurance and food at the same time. So here's the rub. How does one who cannot afford insurance pay the fines and get the coveted insurance he cannot afford. How does he get to work with no car and not enough for cab fare. How do I pay all that and still afford adult diapers and the special food and the high electric bills because my daughter cannot sweat or regulate her body temperature and still pay the fines I don't have the money for,,, etc. And my situation is not all that unusual. I now ride a bicycle to work. This is easy for me as I am a bicyclist anyway. And the weather in Oklahoma is mostly dry so it is agreable(and cheap!). So according to the system, I deserve to be hurt and through this pain I should become a better citizen. If I didn't deserve this I would have been wealthier and my child would not have been born with so many challenges. I guess I got it comin'. Spank me Uncle Sam, I've been bad.
Fred
MichaelTh Comment by MichaelTh on February 18, 2009 at 7:47pm
Fred thanks for the reply and your imput.

My parents were hard working people. When I was a kid my dad was a coal truck driver and owner. My mom worked a part time job as a school aide while going back to college and raising her familiy. My parents were also among the working poor. They never had problems with the law and certainly had no drug or alcohol use.

My parents are devout christians, and though they have some liberal ideas and views they are also in a lot of ways fundamentalists.

I get so annoyed when I watch preachers on tv. Not only do so many of them preach the prosperity gospel, but so many of them also preach that poor people are poor because they are immoral, not right with God, and other such non-sense.

Also, I consider myself the working poor. I work for the state of Kentucky and while I have a really good job it just doesnt' pay a whole lot. I make it by fine but I have no kids and no spouse. So its easy for me to get by on my salary but I would be in bad shape trying to live on my income with a spouse and kids.
dlw Comment by dlw on February 21, 2009 at 1:56pm
Michael, I recommend you take a little time to consider the Basic Income Guarantee program. As I wrote in my top 5 issues, I think if we could shift the nat'l tax burden from income taxes to Land Value Taxes, taxes on commercial advertisements, "bads" like pollution or larger monetary donations to politicos, nonrenewable resources and the revenues of a nat'l public mutual fund that would combine the properties of an index fund and a hedge fund then we could transform the nat'l income tax morass (and all of our existing nat'l welfare programs) into a simple social insurance plan. This plan wd entail simple guaranteed monthly income transfers to all adult citizens who haven't broken the law recently and a low flat tax on all income(labor and capital) that would be calibrated annually so as to raise almost enough public revenue to pay for all of the income transfers.

There's nothing better to reduce poverty while keeping incentives to work and keep one's nose clean present. And the other tax sources would tend to discourage wealth creation less than income taxes do. The above is not per se feasible, but that shouldn't keep us from talking and sharing about it as a future possibility.

dlw

Comment

You need to be a member of Recovering Evangelical to add comments!

Join Recovering Evangelical

© 2010   Created by J. Christopher LaTondresse.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service